Why People Make & Solve Problems

The other day, I was discussing to an associate about the philosophical variations of those who appreciate fixing issues, those who create issues, and those who quit in worry of the nearing front lights dooming themselves for a head-on accident of "you know what - happens" and as we mentioned this I noticed that there is a extensive parameter based on the conditions. john oczypok  Some issues we cope with every day, some individuals cannot seem to cope with, and others cause us to implode in pressure. Okay so let's discuss.

Now then, it is a deserving action to fix issues and we need more issue solvers and less issue creators it seems. Of course, if we didn't have bad issue solvers doing foolish and ridiculous factors, then us actual issue solvers wouldn't be required I assume. Maybe we need some of each - those who practice all the audio and rage, and those who improve the guideline, so they can begin their disorder, uproar, and debate again?

That's an exciting idea isn't it that typical need of the actual creators and the issue solvers. Could it be that those in a pursuit to see individual privileges, independence, independence, and democracy world-wide would be at a decrease in factors you can do with their extremely energy position without the criminal nation-states resulting in issue or the two-bit third globe dictators who are regularly up to no good? Perhaps, this gets returning to that old quote; "you are either aspect of the issue, or you are aspect of the solution" and whereas that maybe appropriate, those who are aspect of the issue see the remedy services as the issue - more intense sometimes they are right!

You see, sometimes the do-gooders cannot keep well enough alone, and in their hurry to provide the issue then become a extremely defense mechanisms fighting the excellent individuals, and excellent tissues, rather than the resource of the issue of the malware, bad parasites, or malware. john oczypok Do you see that point? One of the greatest issues I see is straight line creating decisions, pushing on the law of random repercussions, so sure of the choice, one which is expected to be "time tested" and basically well known that the woodlands can no more be seen for the plants they encroach upon with their fight axes prepared to rip.

In the procedure they create issue rather than avoiding it, and to what acquire I ask? john oczypok None of course is the response, so why do it? Why fix issues only to create more, and when that's done, what's the distinction or end objective, other than job security? Perhaps this is why I've always liked Einstein's quotation to this irony; "Brilliant individuals fix issues, prodigies avoid the issues in the first position." Please be considering here, philosophically that is, before you set out on a objective to right a incorrect, only to discover yourself wronging the right.